What the offer means for the Taiwan Strait and US-China relations
US Ambassador to China David Perdue told Fox News Sunday that President Trump asked Xi Jinping during their recent summit whether he wanted to buy American weapons. He actually asked President Xi, would he like to buy some, at one point, Perdue said. The remark, made days after Trump hosted Xi for a state visit at the White House, has stunned diplomatic circles because it would upend decades of US policy toward China and Taiwan.
Perdue said Trump raised the prospect of arms sales from the US to its ascendant geopolitical rival, adding that the offer, if consummated, would expose US technology to a potential foe. The US is bound by its own laws to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself. While not recognising Taiwan as a country, the US is the islands strongest informal backer and arms provider.
If the US begins selling weapons directly to China, it would dismantle the decades-old framework that has kept the Taiwan Strait stable since 1979. For readers in the US, UK, and Australia, this means a single casual question at a White House dinner could reshape the entire security architecture of the Asia-Pacific, from Japanese defence policy to Australian force posture.
The timing is critical. Trump hosted Xi for a three-day summit at the White House ending September 25, with a state dinner and a tour of the National Archives. During the summit, Xi pressed Trump on Taiwan, saying he hoped the US would handle the Taiwan question with prudence. The 14 billion arms sale package to Taiwan, which Trump had described as a very good negotiating chip with China, was already paused since May, well before the summit.
Perdue pushed back on suggestions the US is appeasing Beijing, stating that Trump is as strong on Taiwan as Ive ever seen anybody and has sold it plenty of weapons. But the offer to sell directly to China contradicts decades of US policy that has treated arms sales to Beijing as a red line.
The US State Department confirmed: US law prohibits arms sales to China, and there is no offer or plan to sell arms to China. Congressional reaction has been swift, with lawmakers from both parties expressing concern about the implications for Taiwans security.
Perdue’s casual phrasing, would he like to buy some, at one point, treats a decades-old strategic embargo as a casual marketplace negotiation. The contrast with Trump calling the 14B Taiwan sale a negotiating chip is the detail that matters. No Chinese response has been confirmed.
Sources: AP News