Trump’s federal court rejection: Judge upholds 34-count conviction, blocks presidential immunity defense

August 29, 2026
1 min read

A federal judge in New York has rejected Donald Trump’s latest attempt to escape his Manhattan criminal conviction by moving the case to federal court. The ruling, handed down August 28, closes one legal door but leaves the rest of his legal troubles wide open.

Trump was convicted in May 2024 on 34 counts of falsifying business records. The charges stemmed from a $130,000 payment made by Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels, which prosecutors said was directed by Trump before the 2016 election.

After the Supreme Court ruled in Trump’s favor on presidential immunity last summer, his lawyers saw an opening. They argued that because some evidence and testimony used in the state case involved conduct related to the presidential period, the whole case should move to federal court where presidential immunity might provide better protection. The underlying hush-money payment and the business-record entries at issue date to 2016, before Trump became president.

But U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein wasn’t convinced. Under federal law, removal to federal court after a state jury trial and verdict requires demonstrating good cause and continuous diligence. Trump’s legal team missed that threshold. The judge found their arguments weren’t new—they’d essentially made the same points before. The legal standard for post-trial removal simply wasn’t met.

More importantly, the judge rejected Trump’s argument that the evidence and conduct at issue were protected by presidential immunity. The Supreme Court’s immunity decision protected official presidential acts—things like national security decisions or constitutional powers. Conduct in 2016 involving personal payments and business records doesn’t fit that definition. It’s private conduct, not official conduct.

Trump’s conviction stands. His state-court case remains in New York courts. He can continue appealing through the state appeals process. The judge made clear that this particular legal strategy won’t work. The pathway to federal court has been blocked, but Trump’s legal challenges will continue through state courts.

This is a setback for Trump’s legal team, but it’s not the final word on everything. It’s simply one court saying no to one specific request.

Sunita Somvanshi

With over two decades of dedicated service in the state environmental ministry, this seasoned professional has cultivated a discerning perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental considerations and diverse industries. Sunita is armed with a keen eye for pivotal details, her extensive experience uniquely positions her to offer insightful commentary on topics ranging from business sustainability and global trade's environmental impact to fostering partnerships, optimizing freight and transport for ecological efficiency, and delving into the realms of thermal management, logistics, carbon credits, and energy transition. Through her writing, she not only imparts valuable knowledge but also provides a nuanced understanding of how businesses can harmonize with environmental imperatives, making her a crucial voice in the discourse on sustainable practices and the future of industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

California wildfire liability caps: Newsom’s $21B fund faces August 31 deadline amid insurance crisis

Next Story

Old Farmer’s Almanac winter forecast 2026-27: Northeast cold, West wetter than normal, El Niño influence

Latest from News

Don't Miss