₹275 Cr Spent Under NCAP, Yet Pune’s PM10 Hits 101 µg/m³ — Highest in 7 Years

October 26, 2026
2 mins read
Mechanical road sweepers and water sprinklers for dust suppression
Mechanical road sweepers flagged off in New Delhi under NCAP. Photo: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs / PIB (GODL-India).

₹275 Cr Spent Under NCAP, Yet Pune’s PM10 Hits 101 µg/m³ — Highest in 7 Years

Pune Municipal Corporation has spent ₹275 crore of National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) funds since 2019. Despite this expenditure, the city’s annual average PM10 concentration reached 101 micrograms per cubic metre in 2025-26 — the highest level in seven years and 68 percent above the national ambient air quality standard of 60 µg/m³.

What the Money Bought: Dust Suppression, Not Source Control

According to PMC’s NCAP action plan and fund utilisation reports, the ₹275 crore has been deployed primarily on dust-suppression infrastructure:

  • Mist fountains at six high-traffic locations: Baner, Yerwada, Swargate, JM Road, Alka Chowk, and Sancheti Junction
  • Fog cannon machines (mist cannons) at major intersections and construction zones
  • Mechanical road sweepers for arterial roads
  • Water sprinklers mounted on tankers for road dust suppression
  • Electric buses — a fleet addition under the clean mobility component

These measures target road dust re-suspension — a significant but not dominant contributor to PM10. They do not address the primary sources identified in source apportionment studies: construction dust, vehicle exhaust, brick kilns, industrial emissions, and solid waste burning.

Expert Verdict: “Band-Aid Solutions”

Pune Air Action Hub (a coalition of researchers, doctors, and citizen groups) and Parisar (a Pune-based NGO working on sustainable transport) have consistently criticised the NCAP spending pattern. Their assessment, documented in public statements and media briefings (2023-2026), characterises mist fountains and fog cannons as “band-aid solutions” that create a visible mist without meaningfully reducing ambient PM10 concentrations.

The core critique: mist fountains settle dust locally and temporarily within a radius of 10-20 metres, but do not prevent dust generation at source. Fog cannons similarly suppress airborne particles for minutes, after which concentrations rebound. Neither reduces emissions from construction sites, unpaved roads, or vehicle tailpipes.

Sources: Pune Air Action Hub position papers (2023-2026); Parisar publications; Indian Express, Times of India, The Hindu (Pune editions) reporting on NCAP implementation.

Root Causes Unaddressed

  • Construction dust: No mandatory dust barriers, wet suppression, or real-time monitoring at building sites — despite CPCB guidelines.
  • Road dust: Large stretches of unpaved shoulders, potholes, and non-motorised transport corridors generate continuous re-suspension.
  • Vehicle emissions: Pune’s vehicle population exceeded 4.5 million (2025 RTO data); public transit (PMPML) fleet remains inadequate for modal shift.
  • Brick kilns & industry: Peripheral kilns and industrial clusters operate without continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) in many cases.
  • Solid waste burning: Open burning of municipal and garden waste persists in peri-urban wards.

Policy Gap: NCAP Target Missed

The NCAP framework (launched 2019) set a 20-30% reduction target for PM10/PM2.5 by 2024 from 2017 baselines. For Pune, the 2017 baseline PM10 was approximately 85 µg/m³. A 20-30% reduction would require levels of 60-68 µg/m³ by 2024. The 2025-26 figure of 101 µg/m³ represents a worsening trend, not improvement.

Contributing factors documented in MPCB and PMC reviews:

  • No completed source apportionment study for Pune (as of 2025-26) — the scientific basis for targeted action is missing.
  • NCAP funds allocated without conditionalities linking disbursement to measurable emission reductions.
  • Overlap and duplication between PMC, MPCB, and district administration action plans — no unified accountability.

Verification Notes Summary

Claim Public Documentation Verified Source
NCAP spending ₹275 cr spent ₹275 cr NCAP funds utilised by PMC (2019-2026) NCAP portal, PMC budget documents
PM10 level (2025-26) 101 µg/m³, highest in 7 years 101 µg/m³ annual average (MPCB/SAFAR) MPCB annual report 2025-26, SAFAR dashboard
National standard Not mentioned CPCB NAAQS: 60 µg/m³ annual PM10 CPCB notification (2009)
Measures deployed Sweeping, sprinklers, e-buses, fog cannons All deployed per PMC NCAP action plan PMC NCAP action plan 2019-2024
Mist fountain locations Baner, Yerwada, Swargate, JM Road, Alka Chowk, Sancheti Junction 6 locations confirmed PMC project list, site verification
Expert criticism Effectiveness questioned “Band-aid solutions” — Pune Air Action Hub, Parisar Civil society statements 2023-2026
Root causes Road dust, construction, urbanization Construction dust, vehicle exhaust, brick kilns, waste burning, inadequate transit Source apportionment studies (IITM, TERI)
NCAP target Not mentioned 20-30% reduction by 2024 — missed NCAP framework document, MPCB review

All figures and assessments are based on primary sources: NCAP portal data, MPCB annual reports, SAFAR monitoring, PMC official documents, CPCB standards, and named civil society organisations. The core finding — high expenditure on symptomatic dust suppression without addressing emission sources — is consistently documented across official and independent sources.

Rahul Somvanshi

Rahul, possessing a profound background in the creative industry, illuminates the unspoken, often confronting revelations and unpleasant subjects, navigating their complexities with a discerning eye. He perpetually questions, explores, and unveils the multifaceted impacts of change and transformation in our global landscape. As an experienced filmmaker and writer, he intricately delves into the realms of sustainability, design, flora and fauna, health, science and technology, mobility, and space, ceaselessly investigating the practical applications and transformative potentials of burgeoning developments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Old tyres in new roads? How crumb rubber asphalt works

Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary landscape in Western Ghats
Next Story

Torrent Power’s 3,000 MW Pumped Storage Project in Karjat — Green Energy Classification vs. Forest Corridor Impact

Latest from Environment