Two groups occupied the same public space in Mumbai on October 2 — one protesting, one counter-protesting — and police were out in force at both. Here is a factual summary of what happened and who the organisations involved say they are.
The CJP Protest
Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), led by its founder and convenor Abhijeet Dipke, had planned a protest at Shivaji Park in Dadar on October 2, coinciding with Gandhi Jayanti. The protest centred on demands directed at Chief [Election Commission](https://www.karmactive.com/supreme-court-hear-plea-suspend-cec-gyanesh-kumar-sir-voter-rolls-2026/)er Gyanesh Kumar, concerning CJP’s allegations about the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. CJP alleges the process risks disenfranchising eligible voters; the organisation’s claims are contested and have not been adjudicated.
Mumbai Police denied CJP permission for the originally planned demonstration. CJP said it would proceed regardless, framing the action as a “Jail Bharo Andolan” — a civil disobedience form in which participants invite arrest. The Indian Express reported significant police presence around the Shivaji Park area ahead of the event.
The Counter-Protest
A separate group calling itself Gen Next Mumbai also appeared at the broader Shivaji Park area on October 2, according to a Times of India report. Gen Next Mumbai positioned itself as opposing CJP’s agitation. The report described the two mobilisations as running in parallel, with each group making competing public claims about the electoral process and about CJP’s standing to represent voters’ interests.
Who runs Gen Next Mumbai and who funds it had not been independently verified in the primary reporting reviewed for this article.
What Was Alleged and What Is Established
This is a contested political story. CJP’s allegations about the SIR process are CJP’s stated position. The Election Commission of India stated that the three-member Commission took the relevant decisions unanimously. Any characterisation of the protest as justified or unjustified goes beyond what the primary source material establishes. Both CJP’s assertions and Gen Next Mumbai’s counter-claims are reproduced here as statements by those organisations, not as verified facts.
What to Watch
CJP has indicated it will publish updates on any further developments from the Jail Bharo action. A follow-up protest or legal action by either side would extend this story. Read background on electoral roll disputes in India for broader context.
This article will be updated if official statements from Mumbai Police or the Election Commission are published.