Queensland invests $88.2 million in shark control - but experts question if it will actually save lives

Govind Tekale

The largest shark control investment in 60 years will deploy more nets, drumlines, and drone surveillance at popular beaches starting July 2025.

Photo Source: Steve garner (CC BY 2.O)

Seven beaches targeted for new shark nets and drumlines, including Pacific Beach, The Spit, Happy Valley, Coolum North, and Peregian North.

Photo Source: Rawpixel (CC0 1.0)

"Today's announcement puts swimmer safety first," says Minister Tony Perrett. But will these measures actually protect people?

Photo Source: PICRYL (PDM 1.0)

The shocking environmental cost: Last year alone, 1,639 animals were caught in Queensland shark nets, including dolphins, turtles, and rays.

Photo Source: Ken Bondy (CC BY 2.O)

Marine biologist Lawrence Chlebeck calls the plan "retrograde and irresponsible" with "absolutely no scientific reason to do this."

Photo Source: Australian Institute (CC BY 3.0 AU)

Sea Shepherd warns the plan may breach federal environmental law and could actually increase risks to swimmers by attracting sharks closer to shore.

Photo Source: John Turnbull (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Over 7,800 non-target animals caught in the past decade - including 734 protected species like endangered grey nurse sharks and dugongs.

Photo Source: Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0)

Modern alternatives exist: NSW trials of SMART drumlines show 99% of sharks and 98% of other animals can be released alive.

Photo Source: Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0)

The tough question: Will this historic investment make beaches safer, or simply harm more marine life without solving the problem?

Photo Source: François Libert (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)